home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0695.doc
/
000212_owner-lightwave@webcom.com_Thu Jun 15 02:17:55 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-07-04
|
2KB
Received: by webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA187673298; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 11:08:19 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from arl-img-3.compuserve.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA187573292; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 11:08:12 -0700
Received: by arl-img-3.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515)
id OAA24281; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 14:12:02 -0400
Date: 14 Jun 95 14:01:23 EDT
From: "Bruce G. Considine" <76260.2631@compuserve.com>
To: <lightwave@webcom.com>
Subject: Accurate Lighting?
Message-Id: <950614180123_76260.2631_CHK28-1@CompuServe.COM>
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Thanks for the responses.
Ok all, here's a problem...
Assume you have a large highway advertising sign that you are renovating. You
have the option of enlargeing the sign, changing its shape, changing the
number and brightness of lights that illuminate it, the graphic etc... You
would like to try different configurations and check them for visibility from
the expressway at night before you start. I know Lightwave isn't an
archetectural modeling package but, using Lightwave is it possible to get an
accurate representation of the sign visibility at night? According to the
responses I have gotten from the initial post this problem cannot be solved
with Lightwave.
Thanks, Bruce
No, I'm not trying to render a highway sign at night, but the problem is
representative of a question asked me by another Lightwave animator.
--
"Bruce G. Considine" <76260.2631@compuserve.com> sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com